Monday 3 June 2019

Game of Thrones - In Conclusion

The biggest show on TV ever...? Certainly a notable part of 2010's popular culture. The concluding season had a whole lot of viewer hopes and expectations riding on it and there was no way it wouldn't be sad for most to see an end to it, any which way things went down.

But winter did finally come and it delivered in terms of epic battles and convincing CGI dragons, recapturing the awesome feeling of seeing the Lanister troop caravan getting napalmed in the previous season. Each of the 6 episodes was a 75 minute film in it's own right; the best of television now truly drawn level, or even surpassing cinema, for my liking.

But yeah, of course the writing wasn't great, in terms of plot and dialogue. The show runners had been left the unenviable task of rounding off GRRM's epic fantasy garden of characters, with only rough notes from him about where he has been aiming to take things.

The natural expectation is that the original author will finish the book series properly. But it sounds likely there's a good chance he'll struggle just as much. if he ever gets there at all: GRRM describes himself as a 'gardener', merely tending the seeds of the characters he's planned. Giving them so much agency that he's struggled to get them where they need to go for the plot - Daenerys being waylaid in Meereen a symptom of this.

D&D certainly made substantial compromises to bring things to a deliberate ending. Even with many minor characters and huge elements of the world entirely ignored (like religion and the whole of Essos), season 8 still feels very rushed. Major turning points are so compressed as to be frustratingly unbelievable and stepping stones in key character development are skipped over, making the shape of their arc unrecognisable and actions unconvincing.

Writing quality as seasons progressed (popular meme).

I felt they could have done with about 2 additional series, in place of the last 3 episodes, to have everything make sense. I guess they felt this would have stretched their weak writing even thinner, viewer figures doping off as a result and hurting the appetite for the spin-off shows.

Having watched a few videos and read a few articles about the this last season, here's a regurgitation of their most salient points, mixed in with the biggest issues I had. Huge spoilers ahead, of course!



Final episode - "Bran the Broken [plot]":

This felt more like a Saturday afternoon BBC radio play than top budget TV show. They'd left a whole lot to wrap up in the last 90 minutes and went out of their way to definitively conclude things for each of our established main characters. The result was felt ridiculously tame and in turns predictable or totally arbitrary.

A kind of meaningless end credits epilogue, with a surreal feel at times: Greyworm appearing back in front of Jon, at the top of the stairs to the destroyed red keep, after having been left behind him, slitting throats. Drogon emerging from hiding perfectly buried under snow covered rubble, for no apparent reason (not enough time has passed for this – Daenerys hadn't even walked over to the Iron Throne yet). I guess it this aspect works in putting us inside Jon's POV – staggering around in a bit of a daze, with nothing making any sense anymore.

It was no surprise that Jon had to kill "his queen". Only that she seemingly didn't see it coming. Especially after Arya lays out, for him (and us), how Danny knows who he truly is (to a fault). Maybe she lost 60 or so IQ points in apparently going mad )or she secretly wanted to die?).

There was a whole lot of dialogue for everyone's favourite dwarf. Even Greyworm's barked command to shut up couldn't stop him dictating the order of realm; the new lord and lady masters of Westeros virtually cardboard cut-outs in their chairs.

It would make sense that GRRM wanted his Frodo character to take up the ring crown of power. But there hasn't been nearly enough build up to justify this in the show, let alone foreshadowing. So when Tyrion says "no one has a better story than Bran" it rings totally false - a name pulled out of a bag with totally off-the-cuff justification.

"Why do you think I came all this way...?"
After all the time spent on his arc through the seasons, Bran's powers have achieved nothing much beyond putting the final touches in place for the downfall of the night king (which he presumably foresaw). I mean, in terms of payoff there's no explanation about the lore or powers of these two opposed magical forces. Presumably the White walker stuff is deliberately left to be spun out in the forthcoming nightswatch prequel series.

It makes too little sense that the (second) dragon pit meeting of nobles would meekly rubber stamp the true Stark heir as their supreme ruler. Then also hold their peace as he literally nods through northern independence for his sister to be a true queen, too. Especially after Yara Greyjoy won that promise previously from Danny.

But also, there's nothing about Bran or his actions that might be sung in songs and inspire the masses. If Tyrion could be left entirely out of the history book(s), then Bran would naturally fall into obscurity too, having lurked in the shadows for the brief time he wasn't entirely isolated, beyond the wall. As slayer of the night king, Arya might be famous, but no one (except Bran) was around to see the reason the walkers stopped existing. Indeed, for the southern populous the walkers will remain forever a distant fairy tale (unlike the dragons!).

It's been drilled into us (again by Varys) that "power resides where men believe it resides". But if they've heard of him at all, I'd expect the masses to find this magical cripple to be creepy and ominous. They'd be right to. Making him king is worst than making the NSA the P(ressident)OTUS – he's omniscient of everything that's ever happened anywhere in Westeros, can see glimpses into the biggest future events and has eyes everywhere there are birds (and other animals and simple minded folk). Which also, incidentally gives him complete control of their telecommunications network – no raven flying where he don't want it to, for sure!

At best they've installed a benevolent god dictator. A cheat of an answer to the entire question of the show: "Is it possible to rule for the benefit of all, without getting assassinated?".

It's far more interesting to consider this as an ultra-dark ending: Tyrion visibly takes momentary consider the implications of "Why do you think I came all this way?". Surely he'd realise, now, that Bran must also have foreseen something as monumental as Daenerys incinerating Kings Landing (something teased in his first vision at the end of season 1). Tyrion knows for a fact that he discovered Jon's true heritage and chose to make him aware of it, driving the lovers apart. Whatever guilt and culpability Tyrion feels, Bran's (only significant) actions where seeding chaos even worst than Little Finger's personal 'ladder' of war across the 7 kingdoms. The ladder Lord Baelish fell from when Arya and Sansa blindsided him, due to his imperfect knowledge. Bran would not fall to intrigue so easily and his brute force opposition, of Walkers and Dragons, have been dealt with...



The most tragic death - physical realism:

► The first half of the final season was all well and good for me, right up until the start of episode 4, where we discover that most of what we saw in episode 3 was a lie. It had been an epic battle of sacrifice, almost down to the very last, with seemingly only the last few main characters slogging it out, backs to the wall, atop a writhing pile of reanimated corpses.

My expectations where that these handful of survivors would be helpless against Cersei's southern forces marching in to take them captive, with the best possible outcome a suicidal victory from Drogon to slay the evil queen. Or maybe Cersei just wins, things go back to normal and maybe we flash forwards to gradual improvements in the nature of rule...

But no, despite the dramatic visuals, apparently only half the dothraki died! I guess the survivors (of the stupidest cavalry charge in Westerosy history) must have fled on their horses, under the cover of darkness, because where the hell else could they have been?! It even looked like the vast majority of the unsullied perished, used as a meat shield to cover the retreat against the incoming waves of dead. There wasn't even any sign of the regular northern armies inside the halls of Winterfell, haunted only by zombies in Arya's interlude, or inside the walls in general, as the Night King and his wing-men take a casual stroll right through from the front to the little forest annex at the rear.

So I was rather surprised to see there had apparently been enough survivors to build a bunch of over-sized funeral pyres for the honoured dead (I guess all those bodies that had been longer deceased simple turned to dust?). And that there were the kitchen staff to put on a celebratory feast?! Did anyone actually die, sealed in the crypts?

I guess it's hard to portray the movements of entire armies throughout massive battles, so we're left with more of a metaphorical illustration, whatever...


► But then the cheapest death in the show – Rhaegal effectively gets run over by a bus while crossing the road. Just because the audience is watching a close cropped shot looking back at Danny flying, with her two remaining scaly children, we are to believe that no one spotted Euron's Iron Fleet a few hundred meters in front of them?! And their first ever volley of arrows, fired at sea verses a flying target, scores 3 direct hits!

This was so epically frustrating because it could so easily have been made believable with a mere 30 seconds more footage. e.g. Danny spots the fleet (like, 10 minutes out, probably), swoops in to burn it, but it's a trap with Euron unveiling the new scorpions at the last second, getting one lucky shot off after loosing a few ships. (It would make sense that they'd keep the fleet's scorpions ultra-secret in port and en-route, with the risk of spies giving the game away.)

3 direct hits on Rhaegal, captain, and there's an Iron fleet de-cloaking off the starboard bow!
But no. The Iron fleet is a cut-scene that happens with a coin flip as to weather it will achieve a flawless victory, as it did in the previous season, appearing magically out of the mist to ambush Yara's fleet in the dead of night. Or a perfect loss, as in the penultimate episode.

I guess the series really struggled with naval scenes in general, with Euron apparently rebuilding his fleet between series 6 and 7 and I totally lost track of where Danny's ships were supposed to have come from in each instance in season 8, after all/most were destroyed in the ambush at Lanisport during the Unsullied's siege of Casterly Rock...?

Of course it's majorly difficult for a TV show to depict navies realistically, e.g. when Yara & Theon's dozen extras escaping equates to 30 odd ships sailing away in the distance. But all naval matters just happen arbitrarily – like the vastly superior Iron Fleet sits idle in port while the northern armies make landfall on the other side of King's Landing...?

Then, of course the whole Iron Fleet is casually incinerated by Drogon, who comes back inexplicably stronger than a powered up Batman. I guess he was always capable of this, but Danny was too rattled to fight after randomly loosing another child to unexpected anti-air weaponry. So she just let her fleet get trashed right on the doorstep of Dragonstone castle, with Mesandi (alone) captured, pivotally.

Actually, the ship-on-ship aspect of that naval engagement of made little sense too: in equipping the Iron fleet with balistas they must have removed the catapults/trebuchets we saw in action the previous season, which flung flaming balls at Yara's fleet. The balistas could actually be significantly worst for ship-to-ship combat, since it takes only one fire strike to sink a wooden ship. And Dannys ships were presumably the ones captured from the rebelling slave masters, which were lobbing fire bombs at the great pyramid of Meereen, so should have been able to return fire, literally. But I'm nitpicking speculation at this point...


► The burnination of Kings Landing was worst, in a way – it's an eventually I'd not expected, partly because there's been no logical reason for Danny to systematically raze every building in the city (while ignoring Cersei), but more because I didn't think it possible for a dragon to breath fire for 30 minutes straight!

The fictional universe seemed to be very carefully constructed to not have rainbow propelled unicorns – i.e. totally arbitrary magical capabilities. There's a whole lot of time spent on human made wildfire that's almost certainly a dragon-fire analogue. And the dragons themselves are physical beasts who suffer in the cold and have to eat (a lot) to continue existing and grow, etc. Kind of like the dragons in the movie Reign of Fire, their CGI faces seem to have place to expel flammable excretions, etc.

Each explosive exhalation must consume physical mass from their bodies, so they must have a hard physical limit. If each big Drogon "dracaris" is roughly equivalent to a large napalm bomb, then dragon fire would already need to be at least 10 times more mass efficient than real life incendiaries to have facilitated all the previous engagements we'd seen.

The battle of Winterfell was really pushing this limit, but not tied from that at all, Drogon has enough fuel to flame 150 odd ships in harbour and the entire perimeter of a 1 million population (low rise) city. And how dumb of a plan it was to take on the dragon slaying fleet before opening the gates for the main army? Unnecessary, too, except as dramatic revenge. I guess it was mostly to make it feel cool to watch, exactly like a Rocky comeback – a meaningless, logic free resurgence that apparently many/most movie audiences would have no problem with, so why not here?

To really rub in the ludicrous scale of these flames we see caches of wildfire, throughout the city, going up in green flames. All those cellars stocked with tones of bottles barely even a side-note. Despite all this, there doesn't seem to be much evidence of secondary fires. Which was seemingly what Tyrion had worried about in previous seasons, counselling against a direct attack on the capital because it could easily raise a spreading firestorm. Like the WW2 Dresden bombing did, on purpose, or as happened to historical London several times, with only a point source of ignition.

I guess spreading flame would have been too slow and subtle to film; much more fun and impactful to have a dragon roaring overhead like a jet bomber in some war torn Middle Eastern region (with infinite ammo). I guess the sequence did at least do a decent job of bringing home the horror and carnage of being on the ground, under air-strikes. Arya, victorious over unspeakable evil magic, now helplessly battered trying to escape, to bring it home. And Jon yelling "Have you been down there?!" could apply to US drone pilots, military commanders or the public in general, funding our contemporary actions. (I doubt it'll have much/any political impact, to be honest.)


► It's barely even worth mentioning that Jamie is miraculously able to stagger up (and back down) hundreds of feet of Red Keep stairs (there's no lifts) after being impaled through the chest twice with Euron's foot long dagger. So set was the plot on having him reunite with his whimpering damsel in distress sister/lover/tyrant.

► Or how it makes any sense for closing scene with Tyrion leading a meeting of the king's council with a sit com feel – Kings Landing is literally a smouldering pile of rubble, with no support network to sustain their existence in the old capital. They're talking about rebuilding ships verses brothels, but the infrastructure of society is gone. No food stores, bakeries, breweries, blacksmiths, nothing, and EVERYONE IS DEAD! (Although I suppose there was, in reality, only superficial damage, like the troop looses from the battle of Winterfell being capped at 50%.)

Yes Prime Minster King Bran.


Real world implications:

► For my liking, this show's given value to society beyond entertainment, in the same way that hard sci-fi does – to aid understanding civilisation and how it will change.

The remove of its medieval setting perhaps makes it easier for viewers to gain a more objective insight into the individual and collective human psyche. For example, how one little idea, the notion of royal bloodline succession, can (and has) enabled massively destructive wars and conflagrations.

Which is why just installing Bran as ruler at the end is so bad, in glossing right over this immense shift in thinking that's supposed to suddenly happen. But then they just removed all religion too – a set of ideas (a memeplex) historically closely intertwined with supporting monarchic dictatorships, etc. The ending is empty of any meaning to interpret or debate, here.


► Climate change allegory – in the long forewarned coming of winter and white walkers to kill everyone, that's being totally ignored or ridiculed by most of Westeros, across the show. Deadly cold perhaps a mirror of global warming (although played down by GRRM). Maybe there was a net-positive effect here, helping people entertain the possibility of such an insidious, unseen calamity.

I was initially frustrated that the show failed to move up to a more sci-fi plot line (naive as I was) after a few series. But I think it's really fitting how the majority of human discourse, in both fictional and real world cases, is unproductive back and forth arguments and unconnected side-issues.

It kind of makes me wonder if we'll also see the worst effect of climate change heroically mitigated by only a fraction half of the world's nations. E.g. China/Asia boldly forging ahead and the less developed countries sacrificing ever more, despite being hit the hardest by the negative effects, while the global West backslides through corporate and institutional inertia, fulfilling a similar antagonist role to Cersei's southern kingdoms.


► Female power – after initial titillation, the show grew us strong female lead characters. Sansa ended up a cunning queen and Arya the ultimate saviour of humanity. Although that was eroded by her failure to do anything at all, purely buffeted around by events after episode 3.

Then there's super-bitch Cersei, who was reduced to sipping wine and whimpering in her brothers arms. And Danny who turned into a 2D, deluded mad tyrant. While Yara didn't real get a looking and we don't even know if mother sandsnake survived Cersei's tortuous imprisonment.

Brienne was finally accepted by the patriarchy and knighted by Sir Jamie, who then finally managed to jumped her bones before leaving her brokenhearted and crying, though clearly still enamoured with him.

I don't know if the last season undid any feminist positivity that this "tits and dragons" show developed, but it felt like a bit of a wash in conclusion.


► No one ever really changes – is an arguable conclusion from several of the character conclusions. A terrible moral philosophy to portray!:

• Falling entirely short of slaying Cersei (as I hoped/expected), Jamie's personal growth did nothing to free him from her, ending up right back in her arms, as always, damn the consequences.

• Jon goes back to the wall, castigated by society.

• The hound dies in fire, still hating his brother to death.

• Missandei dies in chains.

• Daenerys turned out to be a mad Targaryen after all, just like her father, but far more damaging, thanks to rallying support by flying a banner of justice and freedom.

• Of course there are counter examples, too, Sansa being the most prominent.


► Politics – the dark dragon queen ending has the most political significance. (Incidentally, I liked that the story threw us this sting in the tail, but they just rushed it too much and dropped the ball entirely in making it believable.)

Daenerys basically becomes Hitler. And many my see our slow slide towards authoritarian right wing leaders, here. But I worry that the events of the show will work more potently the other way around:

For seven seasons she was champion of the downtrodden, a progressive (if fiery) force for change. But it turned out her hopeful revolution was a lie that tricked those with good intentions into empowering her.

I think that better fits the GOP (and maybe Tory) narrative of the danger of big government (taking excessive control). That socialist ideals are doomed to fail like communist Russia, or even that the Nazis were socialists and these ideas are synonymous with evil.

Dragon Hitler arises.
I think I'll end this overblown piece of writing on that melodramatic note. Until next time, heh.

No comments:

Post a Comment

I'm very happy to see comments, but I need to filter out spam. :-)