'News' of the possible casting for Ghost in the Shell seemed rife the other night (
Guardian,
io9,
IGN,
etc,
etc). Probably because Facebook's algorithm can clearly see that I've LIKED the
GITS film and
SAC pages. Dipping briefly into the milieu of rabid fan comments, some alternative names cropped up that sparked me to think I might feasibly use this topic to squeeze a few film reviews into a single post (but then time and length over-ran, so they got their own posts).
Firstly, let me apologise for abbreviating Miss Johansson's name in the title, since she's reported as stating that the contraction
"...sounds tacky... lazy and flippant... violent...[and]...insulting..."; a press convention designed to diminish women
. This according to The Atlantic on
"Scarlett Johansson's [Subversive] Vanishing Act" Note the partially redacted title! lol.
I would actually be fairly pleased with this casting choice in general. I have been pretty impressed with the direction she's taken with her acting roles (aside from the big Marvel money makers): oozing charisma through voice alone in "her", then reversing that completely with the disturbingly cold, emotional sparsity of "Under the Skin" (both 2013). The latter film could be taken quite literally as a metaphor for how the media industry feed on male weakness, using up successive starlets; all lust with no real intimacy pay-off.
 |
| Scarlett Johansson's shown she has the intensity. (Left: Under the Skin. Right: GITS 1995) |
Whether she's deliberately challenging herself or even being a feminist heroine via clever casting choices is debatable. Obviously her sexuality never goes unnoticed, or uncommented. Supposedly it is flaunted in "
Lucy" (2014 - though I've yet to watch it), in which her character uses
"looks... as a utilitarian instrument of revenge" [Atlantic]. Obviously these 'looks' also woo a certain audience segment, too. This sounds just fine for Motoko's role, in certain respects. If this live action film leans towards the more overtly sexualised Major of the TV series (even more so the original manga...), then Johansson's reputation may be even more fitting (for better or worst).
My enthusiastic review extended into a whole blog post.
My concerns with Scarlet are more on how convincing fight scenes might look; I remember Scarlet's secret agent action role in "Iron Man 2" broke the 4th wall for me, in terms of believability for the physical capabilities of her body shape. Actually not so terrible, reviewing
that scene. But the major generally goes toe to toe, rather than mauling opponents like a demented, Kung Fu squirrel. Maybe this inflexibility is a sexist failing on my part;
"refus[ing] to embrace women in their entireties." [Atlantic].
Emily Blunt - has greater stature and already filed a military command role as Rita Vrataski (image above). She also has under her belt (the pretty decent) sci-fi action
"Looper" (2012), with
"Adjustment Bureau" (2011 -
blogged here) rounding out the A-list of male action stars shes played support to. She actually
turned down the 'Black Widow' role that now lets Johansson net serious money as an establish action star ($10M on the table for GITS). So if the current casting falls through (
again), maybe history will be mirrored.
.jpg)
My blog post with analysis and criticism.
Blunt reminds me strongly of
Keeley Hawes (in
Ashes to Ashes): aside from being somewhat identical, both are type cast as indomitably assertive women with posh English accents. Which is all good. But I've yet to see Blunt in a lead role, and she seems to have a tendency towards hanging slightly agape, rather than tight lipped, steely determination.
Rinko Kikuchi - you might have hoped, would be more of an obvious choice, given that she's a japanese actress who has starred in a number of (English language) action blockbusters, (including 'Mako Mori' in the terrible Pacific Rim, see linked post below). Sadly, I think her accent is too strong to deliver the necessary philosophising with any serious weight (in a language I can comprehend, anyway).
